Secular people often sings the melody, but on the religion, false rationalism 'to gain the fear that' secularism is merely the separation of religion and state and a secular state, not an ethical agenda It consists of good and evil in the neutral (neutral) is used. ' The purpose of this claim, to prove (rather spoof) occurs that (1) the secular state, a positive (positive, like the fact that he is) does not state that narmytu (normative, like the fact that it should be), ( 2) therefore undermine the secular state, I do not have any idea (3) the promotion of good ideas, but is an equal opportunity (4) The State-positive (secular) should be based not on religious grounds It is considered neutral in terms of religion because (Have you noticed that apparently 'innocent' to see how dangerous this claim incident occurred is printed).
But secular people say that "secularism is merely the separation of religion and the secular state and its no moral agenda (of the concept of right and wrong upymanh) is not 'not only funny but also a contradiction in itself (self-contradictory ) is claimed. I imagine myself that religion be separated from the state, '' should '' (the word 'should' consider) an ethical choice and not a matter of priority? Then say, 'religion remain restricted to private life' must '(the word' should 'focus on collection) right and wrong choice of a particular priority? (Obviously the ideal of secularism still not convinced of the moral priority, such as Marxism in its original form, the individual freedom of religion is not lawful). Then imagine that instead of religion or any other basis of collective management (eg human rights) be based on '' should '' (the word 'should' come again) a concept of right and wrong? Emanating from the Human Rights welcomed the good ideas on the other, to give priority, not a moral priority, then the world's human rights test of good ideas 'test' and the test assay them, 'of being right or wrong to pass judgment' bzab himself devised a measure of good and evil is not conducted? In fact, this kind of childish about secularism, can claim the same person again about the discourse of secularism unaware situation hu.aysy rational person can only be
Thursday, 28 January 2016
'Secular state is not an ethical agenda ... secularists, deceitful updates
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment